A Possible Opportunity

Shane, an employee of a government-owned vendor, tells Julio that he has a cousin who can help secure the permits he needs to do business. The permits require Julio’s signature and the payment of a one-time fee. Shane’s cousin’s help can trim about six weeks off of the processing time and tells Julio there are no laws in his country against such practice. Shane asked Julio to set up a lunch so that Julio can meet his cousin. What are the red flags in this scenario?

Suggestion that a normal process can be expedited for a fee to a third party (Shane’s cousin)

Suggestion by a government-owned vendor to use a specific consultant

Shane’s suggestion that Julio should buy lunch for Shane’s cousin

Select all that apply and the Submit.

Submit

Sample Text

That's correct.
Engaging with a third party who is suggested by a government employee and paying for expedited processing are both potential red flags. Even if you believe that you know the law of the land, you should always confirm with your manager, Compliance Officer or the Law Department if you encounter these or other red flag situations.
Select Next to continue.

That's incorrect.
Engaging with a third party who is suggested by a government employee and paying for expedited processing are both potential red flags. Even if you believe that you know the law of the land, you should always confirm with your manager, Compliance Officer or the Law Department if you encounter these or other red flag situations. The correct answers are now shown.
Select Next to continue.

That's partially correct.
Engaging with a third party who is suggested by a government employee and paying for expedited processing are both potential red flags. Even if you believe that you know the law of the land, you should always confirm with your manager, Compliance Officer or the Law Department if you encounter these or other red flag situations. The correct answers are now shown.
Select Next to continue.

That's incorrect.
Select Retry to try again.